{"id":194,"date":"2012-10-01T18:26:03","date_gmt":"2012-10-01T18:26:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/?p=194"},"modified":"2012-10-01T18:26:03","modified_gmt":"2012-10-01T18:26:03","slug":"writing-home-schooled-students-into-the-academy-christian-homeschoolers-in-freshman-composition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/?p=194","title":{"rendered":"WRITING HOME-SCHOOLED STUDENTS INTO THE ACADEMY–Christian Homeschoolers in Freshman Composition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Record:<\/strong> \u00a0Philip Marzluf, \u201cWriting Home-Schooled Students into the Academy\u201d in Composition Studies<\/em> 37, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 49-66<\/p>\n

Summary: \u00a0<\/strong>Marzluf<\/a>, professor and director of the writing program at Kansas State University, here pens a thoughtful reflection on the challenges that arise in composition courses when conservative Christian homeschoolers enroll in them.\u00a0 The attraction of this paper is not so much its empirical base as in its grounding in a more theoretical literature that seeks to understand what professors should do with ideologically narrow-minded students in classes that require exposure to and conversation with multiple perspectives.<\/p>\n

Marzluf interviewed seven previously homeschooled students at Kansas State, six of whom identified as conservative Protestants.\u00a0 He spoke with each participant four times over the course of a semester and collected and analyzed the papers they wrote for their classes.<\/p>\n

Marzluf is very explicit that he is speaking neither as a critic of nor an advocate for homeschooling, and he is also not concerned with the academic achievement of these students relative to their non-homeschooled peers.\u00a0 All he cares about here is how these students interpreted their experience in the secular university and how professors can best teach them.<\/p>\n

He found that these Christian homeschoolers experienced a bit of difficulty at first in their writing classes figuring out how to write for a non-Christian audience.\u00a0 Their early papers tended to included a lot of proof-texting from the Bible and were usually about predictable topics with predictable theses\u2013homeschooling is good, abortion is bad, homosexuality is wrong, government should stay out of family life, and so on.\u00a0 Most of these students had led fairly sheltered childhoods (all described how a major motivator for their parents\u2019 decision to homeschool was fear of \u201cdanger lurking in the public schools.\u201d (56))\u00a0 But gradually these students figured out that the rhetorical strategies that they had always relied on at home are not acceptable in the academy.\u00a0 With their professors\u2019 help, they were able to construct new forms of argument that rely less on Biblical quotations and more on secular forms of evidence.\u00a0 They did not, however, change their views on the topics they discussed in their papers, nor did they grow more hospitable to alternative perspectives.<\/p>\n

As students grew in their awareness of secular modes of discourse, they also became adept at identifying \u201cideological hotspots\u201d where they believed the university was biased toward the left.\u00a0 Examples include repeated \u201cbashing of George W. Bush\u201d in classes, unquestioned commitment to evolution, and commitment to gender equality.\u00a0 Nevertheless, these students came to embrace as their own a very thin form of tolerance.\u00a0 They didn\u2019t change any of their own views, but they did come to accept that college is about allowing everyone (including themselves) to speak their minds.\u00a0 They were able to temper their need to turn every class into an opportunity to evangelize without compromising their own commitments.<\/p>\n

After surveying his students\u2019 attitudes, Marzluf lays out some practical advice for professors who teach such as these.\u00a0 First, he counsels modesty in any attempt to \u201cconvert\u201d such students to open-mindedness.\u00a0 He notes other research that has shown repeatedly just how little most students actually change in college.\u00a0 Most college students, like these homeschoolers, become adept at segregating their classroom selves from their real private selves.\u00a0 Professors who feel the urge to transform their students are likely to be disappointed.<\/p>\n

Second, Marzluf advocates that professors strike a balance between pedagogical sensitivity to their homeschoolers\u2019 world view and the secular identity of their college classroom.\u00a0 Professors will likely have better results if they enter empathetically into the Christian self-understanding of these students.\u00a0 They may even be able to draw such students into a bit of self questioning by assuming heuristically some of the same beliefs these students hold and then using them to raise questions.\u00a0 For example, if all people are sinful, including the student, then could not he or she be mistaken about some of his or her beliefs?<\/p>\n

Even as they grow sensitive to the theological orientation of their students, Marzluf reminds his colleagues that they should not feel obliged to surrender the secular nature of their classroom.\u00a0 Homeschoolers do not have a right to preach or intimidate students they feel are godless or too liberal.\u00a0 Professors have the authority and responsibility to maintain an atmosphere of tolerance and openness in the classroom, and they do their homeschooled students a disservice if they do not teach them how to discourse in secular modes.\u00a0 He describes successful strategies for helping students revise their papers so that they transform their rhetoric from \u201csacred home situations\u201d to \u201cthe expectations of public and secular audiences.\u201d\u00a0 (p.63)<\/p>\n

Appraisal:\u00a0 <\/strong>This article contains much wisdom for those who teach writing to undergraduates.\u00a0 Likewise, many faculty who are not directly involved with composition courses would find Marzluf\u2019s thoughtful description of the tensions between conservative students and the liberal academy engaging.\u00a0 While not a rigorous piece of empirical research, Marzluf’s paper is full of wisdom and insight drawn from years of classroom teaching.<\/p>\n

Milton Gaither, Messiah College<\/p>\n

Disclaimer<\/strong>:\u00a0 The views expressed in reviews are not the official views of ICHER or of its members.\u00a0 For more information about ICHER\u2019s Reviews, please see the \u00ab\u00a0About these Reviews \u00bb Section.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Record: \u00a0Philip Marzluf, \u201cWriting Home-Schooled Students into the Academy\u201d in Composition Studies 37, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 49-66 Summary: \u00a0Marzluf, professor and director of the writing program at Kansas State University, here pens a thoughtful reflection on the challenges that … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5,15],"tags":[112,111],"class_list":["post-194","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-collegepostsecondary","category-religion","tag-composition-studies","tag-philip-marzluf"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=194"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":215,"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194\/revisions\/215"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=194"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=194"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icher.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=194"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}